N&R Contradicts Itself on ACORN story

In Sunday’s Editor’s Log, John Robinson wrote a lengthy justification for ignoring, then burying the ACORN prostitution video story.  He claims (among other things) that, because it wasn’t a local story, there was no need to put in anywhere near the front page of the newspaper.*  Sunday, John Robinson wrote: “We don’t have reporters in Washington, but ACORN’s Web site lists offices in Raleigh, Charlotte and Durham.”  Today, the N&R is reporting: “[T]he staffers laid off by the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now have kept working as unpaid volunteers. The nonprofit has offices in Charlotte, Raleigh, Durham and Greensboro”  (em added).  So, is it a “local” story or not?

*But they do admit that ACORN was involved in get-out-the-vote efforts in Greensboro prior to the last election and the State Board of Elections is “apparently” investigating their efforts here in NC.  “Apparently”?  Can’t they find this stuff out?  Is it secret?  In any case, voter fraud in NC would count as a “local” story in my book.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: